Wilde Leck

pl

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Wilde Leck

Quality:

Wilde Leck - mountain. Article “Wilde Leck” in Polish Wikipedia has 11.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 4 sections.

This article has the best quality in German Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that (Polish) language version.

Since the creation of article “Wilde Leck”, its content was written by 10 registered users of Polish Wikipedia and edited by 56 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 5 times in Polish Wikipedia and cited 78 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Polish): #12050 in November 2023
  • Global: #123034 in February 2015

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Polish): #411864 in June 2011
  • Global: #1819681 in July 2008

There are 9 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1German (de)
Wilde Leck
24.6908
2English (en)
Wilde Leck
21.2601
3French (fr)
Wilde Leck
21.1542
4Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
18.3581
5Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
13.8152
6Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
11.6048
7Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
7.183
8Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
5.2968
9Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
3.6093
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Wilde Leck" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1German (de)
Wilde Leck
20 101
2Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
4 025
3English (en)
Wilde Leck
2 826
4Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
2 110
5French (fr)
Wilde Leck
263
6Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
223
7Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
181
8Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
118
9Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
115
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Wilde Leck" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1German (de)
Wilde Leck
82
2English (en)
Wilde Leck
40
3Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
9
4Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
7
5Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
5
6Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
4
7Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
4
8French (fr)
Wilde Leck
3
9Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
3
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Wilde Leck" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1German (de)
Wilde Leck
23
2Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
10
3English (en)
Wilde Leck
9
4Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
5
5French (fr)
Wilde Leck
3
6Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
2
7Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
2
8Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
1
9Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
1
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Wilde Leck" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
0
2German (de)
Wilde Leck
0
3English (en)
Wilde Leck
0
4French (fr)
Wilde Leck
0
5Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
0
6Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
0
7Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
0
8Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
0
9Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Wilde Leck" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1French (fr)
Wilde Leck
53
2German (de)
Wilde Leck
8
3Polish (pl)
Wilde Leck
5
4English (en)
Wilde Leck
3
5Dutch (nl)
Wilde Leck
3
6Swedish (sv)
Wilde Leck
3
7Czech (cs)
Wilde Leck
1
8Norwegian (Nynorsk) (nn)
Wilde Leck
1
9Chinese (zh)
維爾德萊克山
1
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Polish:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Polish:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Polish:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Polish:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Polish:
Global:
Citations:
Polish:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
csCzech
Wilde Leck
deGerman
Wilde Leck
enEnglish
Wilde Leck
frFrench
Wilde Leck
nlDutch
Wilde Leck
nnNorwegian (Nynorsk)
Wilde Leck
plPolish
Wilde Leck
svSwedish
Wilde Leck
zhChinese
維爾德萊克山

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Polish:
#411864
06.2011
Global:
#1819681
07.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank Polish:
#12050
11.2023
Global:
#123034
02.2015

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 15 February 2026

On 15 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Wuthering Heights, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, 2026 Winter Olympics medal table, Valentine's Day.

In Polish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jolanta Wadowska-Król, Ołowiane dzieci, Huta Metali Nieżelaznych Szopienice, Kacper Tomasiak, Jerzy Ziętek, Jeffrey Epstein, Julija Szczetinina, Ołowica, Zdzisław Grudzień (1924–1982), Zimowe Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2026.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information